🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities will be cut by over 50%, following a controversial legislative amendment that forced municipal councils to put the fate of hard-won Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include multiple councillors depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to give Māori electors the choice to vote for a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by first putting it to a public vote in their region. Communities frequently spent years generating community backing and urging their local governments to create Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the current administration overturned the policy, stating local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the referendum, 17 voted to keep their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Critics nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented extensive reversals to policies intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it aims to end “ethnic-specific” approaches, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – most cities required to vote supported Māori wards, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

This year’s municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are able to create other types of wards – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards suggested the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that chose to retain their wards.