🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an international accord created to protect women from violence, including family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters gathered in Riga this week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate authority now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in Latvia last year, mandating authorities to establish laws and support services to eliminate all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the first EU country to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a move that rights groups described as a significant regression for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its emphasis on equal rights weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a action sponsored by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right government leader Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary political groups supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked broad outcry both inside the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a national petition calling for the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has called a protest for the coming week, charging MPs of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

International Worries and Possible Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a rash choice fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds support, the president could possibly return the bill for further consideration if he holds concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to legal principles, "considering state and legal considerations, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," commented a rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in multiple European nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• Latvia's vote could affect comparable discussions in additional member states