{'It’s like they’ve erupted out of someone’s subconscious': how horror came to possess today's movie theaters.

The biggest shock the film industry has encountered in 2025? The return of horror as a leading genre at the UK box office.

As a style, it has impressively outperformed previous years with a 22% rise compared to last year for the British and Irish cinemas: £83.7 million in 2025, versus £68 million the previous year.

“Previously, zero horror films made £10 million in the UK or Ireland. Currently, five have surpassed that mark,” comments a film industry analyst.

The big hits of the year – a recent horror title (£11.4 million), Sinners (£16.2m), the latest Conjuring installment (£14.98 million) and 28 Years Later (£15.54m) – have all stayed in the multiplexes and in the audience's minds.

While much of the professional discussion centers on the singular brilliance of renowned filmmakers, their achievements suggest something shifting between moviegoers and the genre.

“I’ve heard people say, ‘Even if you don’t like horror this is a film you need to see,’” explains a head of acquisition.

“Films like these play with genre and structure to create something completely different, and that speaks to an audience in a different way.”

But outside of creative value, the steady demand of horror movies this year implies they are giving audiences something that’s highly necessary: therapeutic relief.

“These days, movies echo the prevalent emotions of rage, anxiety, and polarization,” says a genre expert.

Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Alfie Williams in 28 Years Later, one of the big horror hits of 2025.

“Horror films are great at playing into people’s anxieties, while at the same time exaggerating them. So you forget about your day-to-day anxieties and focus on the monster on the screen,” explains a noted author of horror film history.

Against a global headlines featuring geopolitical strife, enforcement actions, extremist rises, and ecological disasters, supernatural beings and undead creatures resonate a bit differently with viewers.

“It’s been noted that vampire cinema thrives during periods of economic hardship,” states an performer from a popular scary movie.

“It’s the idea that capitalism sucks the life out of people.”

Since the early days of cinema, social unrest has influenced the genre.

Scholars reference the surge of early cinematic styles after the WWI and the unstable environment of the early Weimar Republic, with features such as early expressionist works and Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror.

Subsequently came the 1930s depression and iconic horror characters.

“The classic example is Dracula: you get this invasion of Britain by someone from eastern Europe who then causes this infection that gets spread in all sorts of ways and threatens the Anglo-Saxon heroes,” says a academic.

“Therefore, it embodies concerns related to foreign influx.”

The Cabinet of Dr Caligari from 1920 reflected social unrest following the first world war.

The boogeyman of migration influenced the newly launched supernatural tale a recent film title.

Its writer-director clarifies: “I wanted to explore ideas around the rise of populism. Firstly, slogans like ‘Let’s Make Britain Great Again’, that harken back to some fantasy time when things were ‘better’, but only if you were a rich white man.”

“Additionally, the notion that acquaintances might unexpectedly voice extreme views, leaving others shocked.”

Perhaps, the current era of celebrated, politically engaged fright cinema began with a sharp parody launched a year after a contentious political era.

It sparked a new wave of innovative filmmakers, including a range of talented artists.

“That period was incredibly stimulating,” comments a director whose project about a deadly unborn child was one of the era’s tentpole movies.

“I think it was the beginning of an era when people were opening up to doing a really bonkers horror film which had arthouse aspirations.”

This creator, now penning a fresh horror script, notes: “In the last ten years, public taste has evolved to welcome bolder horror concepts.”

A pivotal 2017 film initiated a wave of politically conscious scary movies.

Concurrently, there has been a reappraisal of the genre’s less celebrated output.

Recently, a nicke l venue opened in a major city, showing underground films such as The Greasy Strangler, a classic adaptation and the 1989 remake of the expressionist icon.

The renewed interest of this “raw and chaotic” genre is, according to the cinema founder, a direct reaction to the formulaic productions churned out at the theaters.

“It counters the polished content from big producers. The industry has become blander and more foreseeable. Numerous blockbusters share the same traits,” he says.

“On the other hand, [these indie works] feel imperfect. They seem to burst forth from deep creativity, free from commercial constraints.”

Scary movies continue to upset the establishment.

“They have this strange ability to seem old fashioned and up to the minute, both at the same time,” observes an authority.

Besides the re-emergence of the deranged genius archetype – with several renditions of a classic novel on the horizon – he forecasts we will see scary movies in 2026 and 2027 responding to our present fears: about tech supremacy in the coming decades and “vampires living in the Trump tower”.

In the interim, “Jesus horror” The Carpenter’s Son – which narrates the tale of biblical parent hardships after Jesus’s birth, and stars celebrated stars as the holy parents – is scheduled to debut soon, and will definitely cause a stir through the religious conservatives in the United States.</

Sean Hall
Sean Hall

A passionate designer with over a decade of experience in digital and print media, dedicated to sharing innovative ideas.